Astro
The Chevrolet Astro was a mid-sized van introduced by Chevrolet in 1985 to rival domestic (American) competitors the Dodge Caravan/Plymouth Voyager twins and the Ford Aerostar. Also sharing the Astro's truck-based platform was its sibling, the GMC Safari. more...
Home
AMC
Acura
Alfa Romeo
Aston Martin
Audi
Austin
Austin Healey
BMW
Bentley
Buick
Cadillac
Chevrolet
Astro
Avalanche
Aveo
Bel Air/150/210
Blazer
C-10
C/K Pickup 1500
C/K Pickup 2500
C/K Pickup 3500
Camaro
Caprice
Cavalier
Chevelle
Cheyenne
Cobalt
Colorado
Corsica
Corvair
Corvette
El Camino
Equinox
Express
G20 Van
HHR
Impala
Lumina
Malibu
Monte Carlo
Nova
Other
Other Pickups
S-10
Silverado 1500
Silverado 2500
Silverado 3500
SSR
Suburban
Tahoe
Tracker
Trailblazer
Uplander
Venture
Chrysler
Citroen
Cord
Daewoo
Datsun
DeLorean
DeSoto
Dodge
Eagle
Edsel
Ferrari
Fiat
Ford
GMC
Geo
Honda
Hummer
Hyundai
Infiniti
International Harvester
Isuzu
Jaguar
Jeep
Kia
Lamborghini
Lancia
Land Rover
Lexus
Lincoln
Lotus
MG
Maserati
Mazda
Mercedes-Benz
Mercury
Mini
Mitsubishi
Nash
Nissan
Oldsmobile
Opel
Other Makes
Packard
Peugeot
Plymouth
Pontiac
Porsche
Renault
Replica/Kit Makes
Rolls-Royce
Saab
Saturn
Scion
Shelby
Studebaker
Subaru
Suzuki
Toyota
Triumph
Volkswagen
Volvo
Willys
The Astro and Safari vans were very successful, especially with large families, conversion companies, and commercial companies. Companies liked the vans because they were also available as very roomy cargo vans, while converters used them as the basis for some very desirable small conversion vans.
Both Pontiac and GMC have used the Safari nameplate (GMC is part of the Pontiac/GMC division); Pontiac used the nameplate on several of its station wagon models from 1955 through 1989. The two Safaris, both Pontiac and GMC, were on the market together (often sold by the same dealerships!) from 1985 through 1989.
Most people refer to the Astro as a minivan, although it slotted in size between the Chevrolet Venture/Lumina APV unibody minivan and the full-sized Chevy Express. Similar to the Ford Aerostar, it was based on a traditional truck frame. A lot of people agree that since the van is so large, its true classification would be considered a mid-size, or "midi" van, like the Toyota Van or Ford Aerostar.
Due to their truck-based platform, the Astro and Safari were oriented more for cargo and towing; a properly-equipped Astro could pull 6,000 lb with ease. This is opposed to the car-based, front-wheel drive minivans which are considered more passenger-friendly but do not have the ability to pull as much weight (3,500 lb is the usual maximum among these).
Initial advertising boasted that it was a vehicle that will "make you realize that life is too big for a minivan", referring to the Chrysler minivans. Its specifications included a 160 to 190 hp (119 to 142 kW) V6 engine, depending on options and/or model year. It seated up to 8 passengers with optional towing capabilities.
In addition to being sold in North America, it was exported to Japan, where the van enjoys a cult following. In 2005, to celebrate the last year of Astro production, Chevrolet of Japan offered a limited edition run of the final production models. The Astro's popularity in Japan was despite the fact that it was only offered in left-hand drive.
Chassis features
Much like the second-generation GM F-body and X-body vehicles, the GM M-van (Astro/Safari) had a bolt-on subframe incorporating the front suspension from a GM B-body station wagon (Chevrolet Caprice, Cadillac Brougham) with a leaf-spring rear suspension. The lower ball joints were larger than their B-body counterparts, however. These ball joints were later used in the final Chevrolet Caprice 9C1 (police package) cars manufactured in 1995 and 1996. They also shared many mechanical similarities to the GMT 325/330 midsize S/T Pickup/Utilities.
As mentioned above, the Astro and Safari were rear-wheel drive vehicles, but in 1990 a new full-time all-wheel drive (AWD) system, designed and developed by FF Developments (FFD), was made optional. This would prove popular in areas where snow was common, giving an extra measure of traction. By the end of the vans' run, many buyers were selecting all-wheel drive despite the significant penalty in fuel economy (17 miles per gallon highway versus 20-21 for rear-drive vans).
Read more at Wikipedia.org
|